I don't know what this will do to robustness and I'm interested to know what 
people experience.

IMHO: If you want robustness (eg killing power without doing a umount), stick 
with the uncached configuration.

-- Charles


On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:54, Charles Manning wrote:
> Hi Yaffsers
>
> Files checked in: yaffs_fs.c, Makefile.
>
> I have added support for generic read/write which uses Linux's disk
> caching. This should (??has the potential to??) improve performance on
> unaligned writes.
>
> This feature is  compile-time selectable (CONFIG_YAFFS_GENERIC_RW).  If you
> comment out the define in the Makefile you get direct read/write. You get
> to play & choose.
>
> Enjoy.
>
> -- Charles
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>------------ This mailing list is hosted by Toby Churchill open software
> (www.toby-churchill.org). If mailing list membership is no longer wanted
> you can remove yourself from the list by sending an email to
> yaffs-request@toby-churchill.org with the text "unsubscribe" (without the
> quotes) as the subject.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This mailing list is hosted by Toby Churchill open software (www.toby-churchill.org).
If mailing list membership is no longer wanted you can remove yourself from the list by 
sending an email to yaffs-request@toby-churchill.org with the text "unsubscribe" 
(without the quotes) as the subject.