Hi Bard,
   I'm glad to fix this program. I'm a newbie of  YAFFS, even I very like it. If Charles agaree me to do, I need some suggentions. It is simple to fix this bug, but let system working fine in same questions, I have no idea yet. 

thanks alot.

Regards,
Russell.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brad Beveridge" <Brad.Beveridge@trimble.co.nz>
To: <guo@unication.com.cn>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 6:05 AM
Subject: RE: maybe I found a bug?


> I'm sure Charles would love a diff file for the fix :)
> You can mail him at manningc2@actrix.gen.nz
> 
> Cheers
> Brad
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: guo@unication.com.cn [mailto:guo@unication.com.cn] 
> > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:27 PM
> > To: yaffs@toby-churchill.org
> > Subject: Re: maybe I found a bug?
> > 
> > 
> > Hi, All,
> >     We checked the source codes of YAFFS and found that  
> > problem: The unlink of regular file is different from special 
> > file(including socket, device and directory). When unlinked, 
> > YAFFS delete special file from YAFFS  object hash table, but 
> > the inode->i_count remains unchanged. We think that yaffs 
> > should not delete the special file when the inode->i_count is 
> > not 0, because deleting from hash table means freeing YAFFS object.
> >     Currently we avoid this by mount any directories which 
> > will create special file and immediately unlink in tmpfs.
> > 
> >     We think this bug(if this is a bug) is easy to fix. 
> > Anyone would do, or we do it?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Russell Greece , Timmy Lee
> >   
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: <guo@unication.com.cn>
> > To: <yaffs@toby-churchill.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:28 PM
> > Subject: maybe I found a bug?
> > 
> > 
> > > this email is a copy of my last one, the program is 
> > > attached.N™ŠŠ²µÉÈ­–z~­ÂÉ­–€jž²™²Š–zžÊjšÊ±~¶ŠÊvjj£~ª¶É­–ƒ†µºn‰Šºzµ²²
> > 
>