On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 10:48 +0100, Nick Bane wrote:

> It looks like the oob is accessible but in a slightly restriced way.
> Hopefully this can all be hidden from yaffs per se via the mtd layer.
> Are there plans to support OneNAND Thomas?
> 
In principle yes, but I still wait for the Samsung driver to show up or
a contract to do it myself :)

> I note the mtd thread in Feb started by samsung (starting from
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2005-February/011860.html). The mood seemed to be to split off OneNAND from generic nand as the access is so different. I was unclear whether this presents OneNAND as non generic NAND mtd technology possibly requiring changes to yaffs eg the test for the device being an "mtd-nand" at mount time.

I'm not sure either. I have just skimmed the datasheet, but it might be
possible to setup a NAND compatible API 

tglx