On 2/9/06, Peter Barada wrote: > I use a YAFFS1 NOR-based system, and in the writes, we lay > down the data chunk, and then the tag. In the unlikely event that a > power-cycle occurs while writing the data, the tag is still empty, but > some of the data chunk is not erased, and then next time a write occurs > into that chunk, YAFFS sees that the write fails since the previous data > was written(and retires the whole block), even though the tag indicated > the chunk is empty. That does seem to be preferable over writing the tag twice. Jon.