On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Charles Manning <cdhmanning@gmail.com> wrote:
> The latest set of changes to support nfs introduced a couple of
> changes wrt readdir. At the time of editing in I was concerned this
> could impact on the busybox rm/dir issue of old, but in the end I
> forgot to test this. My bad!

Thanks for responding!

Does Busybox rm/dir traverse directories differently than the
"standard" GNU coreutils rm/dir?

> I don't currently have a running busybox set up that would test this.
> Could you please test with the previous version
> (03c76f6c10acaf6b8fe36e663abd9a87cf76b9de) and see if the problem goes
> away?

I'll test it probably on Monday, will let you know the results.

Josh