+++ Charles Manning [2010-08-20 14:22 +1200]:
> Thanks Wookey. More questions below...
> 
> >
> > utils/bbl --installer puts in the NOR kernel+buildroot initramfs, which is
> > what gets booted when you do 'boot flash'
> >
> > utils/bbl --kernel puts in the NAND kernel, which is what gets booted
> > when you do 'boot' (or 'boot kernel' I think).
> 
> That's what I thought. Does the one override the other? Do they live in the 
> same NOR-space?

No, the NOR kern+ininramfs lives in NOR
The NAND kernel lives in NAND (There's a clue in the names and they
are the exact same kernel build - the only difference is linking in
the initramfs. You could put them in the other way round if you liked...

 
> > If it's not a new checkout and you previously built 2.6.29, then this
> > is probably a make bug that is not correctly replacing the kernel
> > modules (I've seen that before). If it is a fresh checkout then I
> > don't know what's going wrong.
> 
> I svnb updated, did the mods for 2.6.34 then rm -rf'ed distro and build, then 
> make
 
make distclean is better than rm -rf distro - it tidies up things that
get built/touched in 'trunk' as well as in distro - the build is not
quite a cleanly 'out of source tree' as I would like in a few places.

Nevertheless I'd expect what you have done to work fine.

Wookey
-- 
Principal hats:  Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM
http://wookware.org/