On Wednesday 25 August 2010 22:36:28 Wookey wrote:
> +++ Wookey [2010-08-25 11:30 +0100]:
> > +++ Charles Manning [2010-08-25 15:50 +1200]:
> > > Can someone please give this a look over and add to subversion?
> >
> > OK, done (in trunk).
>
> Oh, forgot to say that I haven't changed the default yaffs checkout
> date - only the makefile stuff. I guess we should, in trunk, but not in 1.0
> branch. But I thought that was a different thing from fixing the
> git/cvs functionality.

Yes, they are independent.

>
> Are we all agreed that trunk should move forward to yaffs-last-week by
> default?
>
> Who thinks the 1.0 release branch should move forward too? (from
> the well-tested 2009-09-10)

There are definitely some advantages to moving forward, but there have been 
two performance regressions recently. However those come after speed ups, so 
the net result is probably still a win.

aa8454786457b8b3144e8859da15ac3719cc0602 (2010-08-20) fixes the worst of those 
performance regressions. The other is related to xattribs being read all the 
time and is being investigated.

The more recent code also has various robustness improvements that come from 
running fuzz testing.

If you want to hold off for a few days I'll give a better indication.

-- CHarles