[Yaffs-archive] RE: Physical block 0 in NAND flash devices

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Nick Bane
Date:  
To: Don Goodeve
CC: yaffs list
Subject: [Yaffs-archive] RE: Physical block 0 in NAND flash devices
I believe the comments below to be entirely correct but irrelevant in this case.

Physical block zero is not being ignored by yaffs as a special block reserved for some other critical function. It is just that the "undefined" value for a logical block in yaffs is zero.

Nick Bane
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Goodeve [mailto:dgoodeve@acumalabs.com]
Sent: 17 June 2004 18:07
To:
Cc:
Subject: Physical block 0 in NAND flash devices


Dear GUXM et al.



The reason for physical block 0 being used differently and reserved is that it is the *only* block in NAND flash devices that the manufacturer guarantees to be free of defects. All other blocks in the device are subject to being mapped out at the foundry, or later in the field.



Check the documentation for your physical devices.



Cheers

         Don





---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This mailing list is hosted by Toby Churchill open software (www.toby-churchill.org).
If mailing list membership is no longer wanted you can remove yourself from the list by
sending an email to with the text "unsubscribe"
(without the quotes) as the subject.