Charles Manning wrote:
> Do people prefer this the way it is or should the default permissions be
> changed?
>
> The way I see it, the current set up is perhaps more secure by default
> (ie. The permissions can be opened up after mount, in a controlled way).
>
> Whatever people prefer, I'm happy with.
>
> -- Charles
>
I don't know which one is better.
The best solution, should maybe be that the root dir should be a real directory,
not a fake one, so that the permissions will be persistent.
I don't think this should be a problem. Was there any reason that the root dir is a fake dir?
Luc
(text/plain)