[Yaffs] RE: Time to drop yaffs RAM support in Linux?

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Martin Fouts
Date:  
To: Charles Manning, yaffs
CC: fouts, coywolf
Subject: [Yaffs] RE: Time to drop yaffs RAM support in Linux?
I'm in favor of dropping them. I would be willing to do the cleanup for
that and submit a patch.

Marty

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Manning [mailto:manningc2@actrix.gen.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 1:41 AM
To:
Cc: Martin Fouts; ;
Subject: Time to drop yaffs RAM support in Linux?


On Wednesday 13 July 2005 15:25, Martin Fouts wrote:
>
> But tell me more, because I'm using nandsim with yaffs2 and it seems
> to be working -- at least for the primitive tests I'm doing. This is
> in a
> 2.6.11.12 kernel.
>



At present there are 4 configurations supported in YAFFS2 for Linux:

yaffs:       YAFFS backward compatability mode with mtd
yaffsram:  YAFFS backward compatability mode with internal RAM simulator
yaffs2:       YAFFS2 mode with 2kpage mtd
yaffs2ram:  YAFFS2 mode with internal RAM simulator


The xxxram versions were really only temporary hacks that were there so
that I could prove yaffs in-kernel without mtd.I also did a really rough
mtd nand simulation to test out the mtd studd.

However, now that things have settled down and the mtd nandsim seems
robust, I would like to suggest pulling out the xxxram variants and just
use nandsim instead.

I would like to clean out dead stuff like this with an eye to cleaning
up code for a kernel integration.

Comments?

-- CHarles