This works for me.
I have permission from my employer to take ownership of the
Linux-specific stuff, so I volunteer for that. I also have permission
to fully GPL anything we do on Yaffs, obviously.
I'd like to offer a compromise on yaffs_guts. I would prefer not to be
inside it, but if I am, we're willing to provide any changes we make in
the form of GPL-ed diff files, fully understanding that you're under no
obligation to take them. As long as yaffs_guts remains dual license that
works for us. If that's reasonable, let's go with it. If not, offer an
alternative.
Marty
-----Original Message-----
From:
yaffs-bounces@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
[
mailto:yaffs-bounces@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk] On Behalf Of Charles
Manning
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 6:30 PM
To:
yaffs@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
Subject: [Yaffs] Offers for help on yaffs
Hi folks
There have recently been quite a few patches and offers for help on
yaffs, and I have been trying to think out the best way to progress
this.
>From my perspective, there are a few issues that need to be kept in
mind:
1) yaffs_guts is quite complex and is the result of many hours of
thought, design, coding and testing. It is by no means perfect and there
are a lot of things that can be fixed and a lot of improvements that can
be made. AT this stage I am reluctant to open up yaffs_guts development
too much. I welcome input and comments, but right now I don't want too
many hands in this code.
2) Since yaffs_guts is part of the dual-licensed Aleph One product, code
ownership gets a bit blurred when others start conttributing to
yaffs_guts.
For now we want to try keep it clean so we don't end up with ownership
issues.
On the Linux-specific stuff (yaffs_fs and yaffs_mtdif etc), these points
don't apply and I really appreciate it when others get involved. For
these things I would like some help and don't like the thought that I
bottleneck the improvement process (which I know I do). This
bottlenecking means that quite a few patches and suggestions doing make
it into the real code.
To overcome this bottlenecking, I would like to suggest the following.
First prize to me would be something like:
1) I keep my primary focus on the yaffs_guts stuff, as well as
supporting yaffs Direct etc.
2) Someone take ownership of the Linux-specific stuff for 2.6 and the
YAFFS2 codebase, including handling incoming patches etc as well as
interaction with the kernel community. This would be the prime focus of
the Linux effort.
3) Any other Linux uses like 2.4 compatability or maintenance of the
YAFFS1 codebase might need someone else to do the work.
I would like volunteers for someone to do job (2). This need not be
forever.
A 6 month or so tour of duty would be fine, IMHO, as would two or three
people sharing the task, but preferably we can end up with a situation
where more people get actively involved in the support and improvement
of YAFFS to everyone's advantage.
Thought/comments?
-- Charles
_______________________________________________
yaffs mailing list
yaffs@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
http://stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yaffs
(text/plain)