Re: [Yaffs] Sorry state of YAFFS2

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Charles Manning
Date:  
To: yaffs
New-Topics: [Yaffs] PATCH!!! PATCH!!! (Was Sorry state of YAFFS2)
Subject: Re: [Yaffs] Sorry state of YAFFS2
On Friday 14 October 2005 08:54, you wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 11:09 -0700, Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
> > First of all, I must tell ya that your mailing list is extremely
> > selective in sending messages. I did NOT get your message in the mail.
> > Ian's message also didn't come through. Other messages did. That's why
> > your message had been copied and inserted into this email by hand.
> >
> > Do you think I'd miss your posting thus making you "right" in having the
> > last word? It's kinda childish...


Lots of abuse, and now paranoia?

I don't own the list, Aleph One does. AFAIK, the list is completely open and
unfiltered in any way.

As I have said before, I am not prepared to put the energy into reading
Sergey's abusive nonsense and I have a filter on my personal emailer that
does not allow anything from him in (though it does not apply any filtersing
to outbound stuff). Applying a filter is not something I did lightly. In
over 20 years in the business have never done this before and hope to never
be moved to do it again.

Perhaps this filtering is causing some loss of feedback, but I think there's
probably better feedback coming from the rest of the YAFFSers that are more
constructive in their approach. Bottom line for me is that I am not prepared
to pander to Sergey's outbursts for the few bits of useful feedback.

If someone else wants to screen Sergey's stuff and repost the useful content I
am willing to read that. Otherwise, I don't think the signal to noise ratio
is high enough to warrant reading.

I continue to try work the problem of the mtd interface to resolve it the
correct way, rather than the ugly hack way. Unfortunately this is taking
longer than expected (over 2 months now!) so it is probably worth putting the
ugly hack into the CVS for now. If someone better equipped with test hardware
etc would like to do this, I would not mind at all is someone else works the
problem.


-- Charles