On Saturday 11 February 2006 12:39, Michael Schmidt wrote:
> I would like to submit that the patch below might be appropriate for those
> who aren't paranoid about ECC errors on read-back contributing to a greater
> chance of future data loss in that block.
>
> Charles, is there anything I've missed?
Hi Steve
I will look into this a bit more.
The selction symbol should be CONFIG_YAFFS_xxxx.
I think a "three strikes and you're out" policy would be a GoodThing.
>
> --MichaeL
>
> --- yaffs_tagscompat-old.c 2006-02-10 16:37:01.000000000 -0700
> +++ yaffs_tagscompat.c 2006-02-10 16:37:04.000000000 -0700
> @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@
>
> static void yaffs_HandleReadDataError(yaffs_Device * dev, int chunkInNAND)
> {
> +#ifdef PARANOID_ABOUT_READ_ERRORS
> int blockInNAND = chunkInNAND / dev->nChunksPerBlock;
>
> /* Mark the block for retirement */
> @@ -347,6 +348,7 @@
> * then retire the block
> * NB recursion
> */
> +#endif
> }
>
> #ifdef NOTYET
(text/plain)