[Balloon] Re: bootldr woes

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Nick Bane
Date:  
To: Colin Tuckley
CC: balloon@balloonboard.org
Subject: [Balloon] Re: bootldr woes
Colin Tuckley wrote:
> Nick Bane wrote:
>
>
>>Most interesting.
>
>
> That wasn't what I said <g>
>

Indeed...

>>Does the flash erase with a stock bootldr? I guess it is just posible
>>that the flash/board is broken.
>
>
> I managed to try this and yes, if I use an original bootldr.small then it
> works (ie I can use it to download and burn itself). It is this version:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 colin colin 55168 2003-10-06 17:53 bootldr.small
>
> boot> ver
> Compaq OHH BootLoader, Rev 2-20-2 for Balloon [BIG_KERNEL] [MINIMAL
> FUNCTIONALITY] [SLOW_CPU] [MONO]
> Last link date: Thu Sep 18 11:17:47 BST 2003
> Contact:
> Contact (Balloon):
>
> Of course I have no idea which source files match this. Do you have any
> ideas what might have changed between then and now?
>

That is very surprising indeed. I will get TCL to check that the one I
am building works/fails. In the meantime I have built the small versions
of 30/31/32/33 and put then in the dev branch of releases on husaberg
for you to test. If you find one that works and another that doesn't it
will give a clue. Do call me on 01954 719270 if you want to talk.

> Just to make sure I repeated my test with the one you built me using gcc 2.95:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 colin colin 54912 2006-03-03 17:08 bootldr.small-gcc2.95
>
> It still fails!
>
> I have to assume there is something different about the sources - maybe some
> change that you have made that only works on a tcl variant and not on a
> guralp variant. Can you identify which sources were used to build the
> working one please?
>

The whole point about bootldr.small is that it knows about NOR and
serial and nothing else so it should work with any loon2.

>
>>The fact that ACK0 is present in the second version suggests to me that
>>there is some compiler/linker dependency horror somewhere.
>
>
> Quite likely, however until we can get a version built with gcc 2.95 to work
> we are walking in the dark a bit.
>

Yes indeed.
>
>>Off for 1/2 weekend's rest and to replace a dead car.
>
>
> Terminally dead? Not fun - what did you buy?
>

Nearly a Zafira. Checking suitabilty (ie not raging unsuitability) for
eldest daughter learning to drive in it was successful. Now to hunt the
right one down.

Nick
> regards,
>
> Colin
>