Re: [Yaffs] Yaffs direct

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MMksi@koi8.net at <-
MCharles Manning at ->
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Ian Oliver
Date:  
To: yaffs
Subject: Re: [Yaffs] Yaffs direct
In article <>, Charles Manning wrote:
> If you must do FAT then it is probably simpler & more efficient to just do a
> FAT file system on top of a block driver and leave YAFFS out of the picture.

Yes, but then we'd need to code all the NAND ECC, wear levelling, etc.

MTD is a no-go due to GPL.

Ian





This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
YAFFS
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-[Yaffs] Re: yaffs robustness against power failuresRe: [Yaffs] Re: yaffs robustness against power failures->
Stoneboat Mailing List Archive administrated by JennyLurker (version 2.3)