Author: Karl Date: To: yaffs Subject: [Yaffs] directory mtime update requires about 30% more I/O in
postmark
Hi,
I run postmark on two versions of yaffs2, one with mtime update and one without,
with a modified nandsim, which records how many read/write/erase during the
test. The result shows that with the mtime update enabled, yaffs2 needs about
30% more read/write/erase I/O in postmark.
In yaffs without mtime update(more clearly, with yaffs_fs.c v1.80 in the cvs
repository, and yaffs_guts.c v1.82) the read/write/erase counting result is: