Yes, the basic principle is the same.
The only differences are that yaffs2 constrins the garbage collection
slightly so that history is not lost. (look for the bit about shrink
headers).
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:46 AM, <
hcgoffo2@rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
> All:
>
> Within the document 'how yaffs works' It discusses both yaffs1 and yaffs2
> operation. But it only talks about Garbage Collection in the section
> relating to yaffs1 (Section 9). Or is this GC method still the same for
> both types?
>
>
> *Henry C Gofforth* / Pr Software Engineer / Air Transport Displays
> Software 4
> MS 131-102, Cedar Rapids, IA, USA
> Phone: 319-295-0373 / VPN: 295-0373 / Fax: 319-295-8100
> *hcgoffo2@rockwellcollins.com* <hcgoffo2@rockwellcollins.com>
> *www.rockwellcollins.com* <http://www.rockwellcollins.com/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yaffs mailing list
> yaffs@lists.aleph1.co.uk
> http://lists.aleph1.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yaffs
>
>
(text/plain)