Re: [Yaffs] seq_file for procfs support

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Andre Renaud
Date:  
To: Charles Manning
CC: yaffs@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Yaffs] seq_file for procfs support
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 at 17:45 Charles Manning <> wrote:

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Andre Renaud <> wrote:

Hi,
The current /proc/yaffs support for Linux seems to be broken on 4.8, I
think because of the way read-offsets are dealt with and the limited
internal buffer (512B). Given that seq_file predates Linux 2.4, would there
be a problem just dropping support for kernels that predate this, and then
moving the whole thing over to seq_file, or are there enough legacy
installations that still require this support?


I doubt anyone is using 2.4 these days, but would a big #if work?

#if VERSION_LESS_THAN_X
static struct proc_dir_entry *my_proc_entry;

static char *yaffs_dump_dev_part0(char *buf, struct yaffs_dev *dev)

...
#else

new stuff

#endif


A big #if would work fine, but it would result in a reasonable amount of
duplicate code - I'm not sure which is the preferred scenario. I'll put
something together and see how it looks.