I updated the latest mtd code and it is now working. Thank you for the help.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Gleixner [SMTP:tglx@linutronix.de]
> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 17:03
> To: Charles Manning; 'velipekka.ylonen@teleste.com';
> yaffs@toby-churchill.org
> Subject: Re: kernel BUG at slab.c:1112! -->NAND issue?
>
> On Sunday 12 January 2003 01:02, Charles Manning wrote:
> > This looks to me like it is happeing in the NAND mtd.
> I don't think so. The stacktrace is not really useful. And it seams to be
> inconsistent.
> > Trace; c00c4d54 <nand_write_page+27c/58c>
> > Trace; c00c6e8c <nand_trans_result+7c/98>
> nand_trans_result is called from nand_calculate_ecc, which is called from
> nand_write_page. So the order in stack is reversed here.
>
> What are the OUT_OF_CODE entries. Do you have modules loaded ?
>
> Bug in slab.c 1112 seams to be the following:
> /*
> * The test for missing atomic flag is performed here, rather than
> * the more obvious place, simply to reduce the critical path length
> * in kmem_cache_alloc(). If a caller is seriously mis-behaving they
> * will eventually be caught here (where it matters).
> */
> if (in_interrupt() && (flags & SLAB_LEVEL_MASK) != SLAB_ATOMIC)
> BUG();
> That's not a nand issue.
>
> What version of MTD code do you use ? Latest MTD-CVS or old stuff ? Make
> sure
> to use latest MTD-CVS.
>
> --
> Thomas
> ________________________________________________________________________
> linutronix - competence in embedded & realtime linux
> http://www.linutronix.de
> mail: tglx@linutronix.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This mailing list is hosted by Toby Churchill open software (
www.toby-churchill.org).
If mailing list membership is no longer wanted you can remove yourself from the list by
sending an email to
yaffs-request@toby-churchill.org with the text "unsubscribe"
(without the quotes) as the subject.
(text/plain)